There is one reader this product has something coherent to offer, and one who should close the tab and keep using the inhaler.
Written by the Breathizen editorial team·Last updated October 11, 2026·How this page was checked
Breathizen suits an adult who wants a cheap, long-running daily habit and who genuinely does not need to know how much of anything is in it. At $0.49 a day across a six-bottle pack it is the lowest per-day figure this desk has published, the prices are all published up front, and a bottle lasts 100 days rather than the thirty most buyers assume. It does not suit anyone with asthma, COPD or any diagnosed airway condition: NCCIH states that evidence does not support using complementary health approaches instead of proven medical management for asthma, and two of the ten supplied reviews make the same point in their own words, one reporting that her clinic told her to keep her inhaler. It does not suit anyone taking an anticoagulant, an antiplatelet or a diabetes medicine, because two of the five named ingredients carry interaction notes and no caution panel was supplied. It does not suit anyone pregnant, nursing or under 18. And it cannot suit anyone who needs to know what they are taking, because no amount is published for any ingredient.
Taken at face value, $0.49 a day across a six-bottle pack is the cheapest per-day figure this desk has published. If what you want is a morning ritual with herbal ingredients in it, and the absence of printed amounts genuinely does not bother you, that is a coherent position and the price supports it.
If you are already buying these separately and are content without weights, consolidating them into one daily liquid is convenient. Go in knowing you are swapping known doses for unknown ones.
Most buyers in this category assume a 30-day bottle. If you were about to price this against monthly capsules, the bottle lasting over three months is a real and favourable difference — and it is the single most useful thing on this page.
Nine of the ten supplied reviews describe a cue, not an effect — before the first call, after church coffee, when the kettle clicks. On a once-daily product, whether it becomes a habit is the thing that decides whether it is in your life at all.
Start here. NCCIH: “Evidence does not support using complementary health approaches instead of proven medical management for asthma.” Two of the ten supplied reviews say it in their own words, one reporting that their clinic told them to keep the inhaler. This is not an inhaler and not a rescue medicine.
Then this product cannot tell you. No Supplement Facts panel, no amounts, no other-ingredients list. If you read labels before you buy — and if you are on this site you probably do — there is nothing here to read.
Two of the five named ingredients carry interaction notes in the sources we opened: bromelain with warfarin and tetracyclines, cordyceps with anticoagulant, antiplatelet and antidiabetic drugs, plus blood-sugar lowering. No caution panel was supplied with this product at all. Take the ingredient list to whoever manages your prescriptions.
Nothing supplied with this product addresses any of these, which is itself the reason to be careful. Most supplement labels carry a line on each. This one, as supplied to us, carries none.
Six bottles is 600 days of product bought against a 60-day refund window. The per-day price only materialises if you take it for most of two years, and you must decide inside the first two months.
The brand's own summary says most people wait three to six weeks, and the longest supplied review runs to day 60. If a quick answer is what you are buying, the company that sells it has already told you otherwise.
If you have asthma, COPD or any diagnosed airway condition, and especially if there is an inhaler in your pocket, read this section twice.
The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, in its digest on asthma, is unambiguous: “Evidence does not support using complementary health approaches instead of proven medical management for asthma.” That is the sentence a product sold for breathing has to be read against.
We will be precise about what that digest covers, because the lazy version of this paragraph would overclaim it. The approaches it assesses are acupuncture, breathing techniques, meditation, yoga, omega-3s, probiotics, soy isoflavones and vitamin D. It does not discuss herbal or botanical products for asthma at all. So it is not a verdict on these five ingredients. It is a verdict on the substitution — on reaching for something of this kind instead of the thing shown to work.
Two of the ten supplied reviews say it themselves, unprompted. One writes: “I keep my inhaler. This is not that. Clinic said keep the inhaler.” Another calls her scorecard a church choir and adds that it is “not a lung-function lab.” Those were written by buyers rather than by the company.
Now put the absences beside that. There is no Supplement Facts panel, so nobody outside the company knows how much of anything is in a 0.60 mL serving, and no caution or warning panel of any kind was supplied — nothing on medical conditions, nothing on prescription medicines. Meanwhile the front of the bottle reads Natural Lung Support, the phrase likeliest to be read as a treatment by exactly the reader who should not read it that way.
We sell this product and earn a commission on it. We would still rather you spent nothing here than treated a 60 mL bottle with no published amounts as a substitute for something a clinic prescribed.
Then the rest of this site is useful to you, and the place to start is the sum on the pricing page: 60 mL divided by 0.60 mL a day is a hundred days.
Nothing is sent anywhere and nothing is stored. The answers stay in your browser.
0 of 6 answered
Then this is an addition to a plan rather than a plan, and the conversation is harder here than usual: you cannot hand anyone a panel. Take the five ingredient names and say plainly that no amount is published. On most products you would photograph the label; here there is nothing to photograph.
Ask first. The summary we opened on bromelain records that “preclinical studies suggest bromelain may increase the risk of bruising and bleeding”; the one on cordyceps that it “may increase the adverse effects of antidiabetic or anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs” and “can also lower blood sugar levels.”
Then this product has nothing for you, and we would rather say so than sell you something you will resent. No panel, no amounts, no other-ingredients list — which on a liquid also hides the carrier, the preservative and any sweetener.
The directions say adults 18 and over, and that is the whole of it. Nothing supplied addresses pregnancy or nursing in any way — which is itself the reason to be careful. Most labels in this category carry a line on each; this one, as supplied to us, carries none.
Then you want the six-bottle pack, and you should see what it commits you to. Six bottles is 600 days — about twenty months — of a product with no published amounts, bought against a 60-day window.
The most defensible version of buying this: $89 for 100 days, at $0.89 a day. Note the timing. The brand asks for 30 days of use before a claim and says most people wait three to six weeks, and the bottle outlasts the refund window by forty days. You will decide on a third of a bottle.
This desk earns a commission on this product and spends most of this site criticising it, so it is worth setting out plainly what the case in its favour actually is.
The money is all published, and it is cheap. One bottle $89, three for $177 at $59 each, six for $294 at $49 each. Every one of those figures was in the pack supplied to this desk, which is more than most products in this category manage.
And the per-day arithmetic is the best we have printed. A bottle is 60 mL and the serving is 0.60 mL, so a bottle is a hundred days, which makes the packs $0.89, $0.59 and $0.49 a day. If what you want is a herbal morning ritual and the absence of printed amounts genuinely does not bother you, that is a coherent position and the price supports it.
The serving instruction is precise. Four pumps, 0.60 mL, once daily, morning before the first meal, shake well first — more specificity than the ingredients get.
There is somebody to call. A phone number, two email addresses, an office address and a separate returns address were all supplied, and that is how to ask the question this product cannot answer in print: what four pumps means in drops.
And the reviews are modest. Nine of the ten describe a cue rather than a result — the kettle, the first call, church coffee, the porch light — and none treats the product as a replacement for a medicine.
Against all of that: no panel, no amounts, no caution statement, no disclaimer on the face we were shown, a claim that says spray on a bottle with a dropper, and five sources of which not one supports a respiratory use. That is the trade, as fairly as we can state it.
Call +1 (302) 200-3480 or email [email protected] and ask what four pumps means in drops on a bottle fitted with a dropper. Ask by email so the answer is in writing.
No. NCCIH is explicit: “Evidence does not support using complementary health approaches instead of proven medical management for asthma.” This is a dietary supplement, not a rescue medicine. Two of the ten supplied reviews make the same point unprompted — one reports that her clinic told her to keep the inhaler.
From the sources we opened, yes — two of the five named ingredients carry interaction notes. Bromelain: preclinical work suggests it “may increase the risk of bruising and bleeding” with warfarin, and it “may increase blood and urine levels” of tetracycline antibiotics. Cordyceps: it “may increase the adverse effects of antidiabetic or anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs” and “can also lower blood sugar levels and may cause harm.” Because no amounts are published, nobody can say whether the quantities here are enough to matter. Take the ingredient list to whoever manages your prescriptions.
Nothing supplied with this product addresses pregnancy or nursing, which is precisely why we would not tell you it is fine. Ask your clinician, and take the ingredient list with you.
The brief says adults 18 and over. There is no warning panel behind that, because no warning panel was supplied.
On this product, more than most — and for an unusual reason. Normally you would take the panel to a clinician so they can see the doses. Here there is no panel to take. The most useful thing you can do is show them the five ingredient names and your current prescriptions, and tell them the amounts are not published.
One bottle is 100 days against a 60-day window, so no pack can be finished inside it. The smallest is still the smallest bet: $89, $0.89 a day, and the only one that does not commit you to years of a product whose amounts are not published.
The struck-through figures are $179, $537 and $1,074 — which is $179 multiplied by one, three and six. A crossed-out price is a claim about what something used to sell for, and no date is given on which this product sold at $179 a bottle. We print the struck figures because they are on the offer, and we print this note beside them because a reader deserves to know they are arithmetic rather than history. · window runs from purchase · no subscription · not for under 18, pregnancy or nursingWritten and fact-checked by The Breathizenres Editorial Desk, last updated October 11, 2026. A highlighted slot means that value has not been supplied yet and nothing has been invented in its place — why the reviewer line is empty.
